NHL’s Slippery Slope
- May 7th, 2009
- Write comment
Nobody is going to argue that Stevie Wonder would have done a better job calling the Wings/Ducks game on Tuesday. Even Ducks fans can’t argue that they were handed the game on a silver platter by that blind, sorry excuse for a referee, Brad Watson. There’s enough commentary out there about how silly it was, I don’t need to reiterate it here.
What I do need to stress is that this is not the first time that the Wings (or any other team for that matter) have been robbed of a game because of one referee’s bad judgement. Why isn’t the NHL talking about this? Do they not see this as a problem? What the league needs is a checks and balances system so that the entire game doesn’t fall on one call. What makes it even worse is this: Under Rule 78.5 per the Official NHL Rules, an instance of a disallowed goal is:
(xii) When the Referee deems the play has been stopped, even if he had not physically had the opportunity to stop play by blowing his whistle.
So even if a referee doesn’t really blow the whistle, but looks like they’re going to, a goal can be disallowed. It’s a slippery slope they’re on with this rule, and I sure hope that by the start of the next season this rule gets looked at.
In the meantime, the Wings and Ducks face off at 10:30 tonight for Game 4, and I’ll be watching. I expect the same “early whistles” for Osgood this time, and if one of the Ducks players digs the puck out from under Ozzie’s glove and tosses it in the net, I better not see anybody pointing at the center line.






